Or I will give you this example of the logic of "increasing light": if you were to say that in 1914 Brazil and Argentina would perish, then, finally, all the kingdoms of the world, then it would look convincing. But if you said that Poland and France would perish instead of Mexico and Argentina, then you would have problems with logic. After all, as we have already said, "a new view of the truth will never contradict the old truth. ' The New World' will never exclude the 'old', but will complement it."

In all your chronological discourse, there are contradictions that prevent us from applying the concept of the "new world" to them. Until 1895, Russell was not a "faithful slave", then suddenly he became one. Is this a contradiction?

109. Galina: No, it's not a contradiction!

110. And...

111. Galina: (Again an attempt to move away from this topic.) What are you talking about Russell, and about the mistakes of forgotten texts?! Do you believe that the Bible is inspired by God?

112. Me: Yes, I do.

113. Galina: So let's talk from the Bible! Look at what you feed people who have been listening to your tales about evil Jehovah's Witnesses for almost an hour!?

114. Me: You say, "Let us speak from the Bible," and the Watchtower of October 1, 1967,25 says that we cannot understand the Bible without an explanation of Jehovah's visible organization. Do you agree with this?

115. Galina: Yes, I agree...

116. Me: Wonderful. I propose a question to all those present. We have two propositions before us:

A) It is necessary to read only the Bible.