A careful study of the answers to this question has led me to believe that the Gospels were indeed written in the first century A.D. X. The Apostles Matthew and John, the disciple of the Apostle Peter Mark, and the companion of the Apostle Paul Luke.

Having recognized the authenticity of the Gospel, I pondered another question: Can everything recorded in the Gospels be considered to have really happened? A thorough study of this question has led me to an affirmative answer.

Then the third question arose: can Jesus Christ be considered only a Man? And if He is not only a Man, then Who is He?

In order to approach the solution of this question directly, it was necessary first of all to find out: Was Christ really risen? The answer to this question should have solved many other questions for me. Having considered all the arguments for and against His Resurrection, I am convinced that He really died and was truly resurrected.

And if He was resurrected, if by His own power He raised the dead and healed the dying in absentia, if the storms and the waves of the sea obeyed His word, then it must be admitted that He possessed supernatural power, was outside the laws of nature, dominated them, and did not obey them, and therefore could not be only Man.

If, moreover, His whole life proves that He was sinless, if His sworn enemies, the scribes and Pharisees, were forced to remain silent when He publicly asked them,

Which of you will convict Me of unrighteousness? (John 8:46) - it means that He could not tell a lie.

Having admitted that Jesus Christ could not consciously tell a lie, I had to admit that He could not have been mistaken, since error is the consequence of a frivolous attitude to the investigation of the truth, and light-mindedness is not characteristic of Him.

And if He could not consciously tell a lie, could not be mistaken, then how could He know all that He was talking about?

D.